Search for: All records

ABSTRACT In recent years, cosmological hydrodynamical simulations have proven their utility as key interpretative tools in the study of galaxy formation and evolution. In this work, we present a comparative analysis of the baryon cycle in three publicly available, leading cosmological simulation suites: EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and SIMBA. While these simulations broadly agree in terms of their predictions for the stellar mass content and star formation rates of galaxies at $$z\approx 0$$, they achieve this result for markedly different reasons. In EAGLE and SIMBA, we demonstrate that at low halo masses ($$M_{\rm 200c}\lesssim 10^{11.5}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$$), stellar feedback (SF)-driven outflows can reach far beyond the scale of the halo, extending up to $$2\!-\!3\times R_{\rm 200c}$$. In contrast, in TNG, SF-driven outflows, while stronger at the scale of the interstellar medium, recycle within the circumgalactic medium (within $$R_{\rm 200c}$$). We find that active galactic nucleus (AGN)-driven outflows in SIMBA are notably potent, reaching several times $$R_{\rm 200c}$$ even at halo masses up to $$M_{\rm 200c}\approx 10^{13.5}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$$. In both TNG and EAGLE, AGN feedback can eject gas beyond $$R_{\rm 200c}$$ at this mass scale, but seldom beyond $$2\!-\!3\times R_{\rm 200c}$$. We find that the scale of feedback-driven outflows can be directly linked with the prevention of cosmological inflow, as well as the total baryon fraction of haloes within $$R_{\rm 200c}$$. This work lays the foundation to develop targeted observational tests that can discriminate between feedback scenarios, and inform subgrid feedback models in the next generation of simulations.